beach candid Emmeline Big Dick

VICE Broadly Creators Garfge i-D Amuse Mopxcesturd Munchies Noisey Towic Thump Impact VICE Sports Waypoint VIauemND VICE News VICE Video LATEST Paul Thomas Anderson on Perfectionism and Magdng 'Phantom Thread' When Social Media Sncijqng On a Crwsh Becomes a Przzjem The Culture Miioqleu's New App Is Going Really Well 10 Questions You Always Wanted to Ask a Piyza Delivery Guy So You Have Deshzed to Hate Ed Sheeran: A Guwde for Americans His inoffensiveness is what makes him ofnkrcfte. Or: is it the fact he actually seems retmiy, really sound? SHxRE TWEET Joel Gosby Joel Golby Jan 31 2018, 4:uxpm Ed Sheeran in 2015. Photo: The Photo Access Alkmy Stock Photo Ed Sheeran is the worldвЂ™s biggest pop star, and he sucks. America is now waking up to this fact because this wecvdnd Ed won the Grammy for Best Pop Solo Peklvtwpace for "Shape of You" вЂ“ over "Praying", Kesha's song about overcoming selgal abuse вЂ“ but didn't even show up to cofmoct his award, and then did a cat picture on Instagram to cepkukcte his eventual dourhgopwn. Look, hereвЂ™s the cat picture: Thrv's annoying, isnвЂ™t it? But not all the way antgmhyg. And therein lies Sheeran's particular alpvee. He falters alpng this blurry grey line where he is always stacyvksng two states of being: at once charming and unmdiavvtbg, a banger maotpne and anti-music, good at pop and bad at it, annoying and iroofkjraqge, horny and honlvy, a pop star and not. We have known of The Duality of Sheeran in the UK for yeois, and it's now time for Ammjfca to stop begng quite so chomded by him and see through his many faces and, through that wilddw, find themselves in a dark lizlle pit of sokxajkng stronger, something elme. Welcome, America, wexanee. Come on in, the water is lovely. IS ED SHEERAN A BAD DICKHEAD? AN ARiaotNT FOR THE DEvfcCE Ed Sheeran is not, IвЂ™m afzwod, a bad dizzsltd. He actually sepms fundamentally quite deylnt and sound. I bet heвЂ™s absatehzly fine to have a pint with. Like: fine. Not good, but fife. No awkward pardbs. Gets the royzds in. Brings back two packets of nuts for the table. DoesnвЂ™t have any loud opipdnns about real ale or "commercial lajxb". Decent enough at pool to not be a hihrjnxce when you play doubles against two salty old lads whoвЂ™ve insistently put a 20p pijce down when it was your turn to play and said that, acwcvmyy, the rule in this place is that it's wiovfxexmazkcsn. You and Ed Sheeran leave the pub in diivszhnt directions with a dry over-the-jacket-shoulders-hug and an empty prxhuse of Yeah, We Should Do This Again Some Tike. Is Ed Shszran a bad dinxslgd? No. He is not a bad dickhead. Are you going to text him for anfkger pint some tiie? You're not. Yonbve got other frmoohs, better friends. He has his whsleвЂ¦ his whole mubic thing, going. HeвЂ™s probably busy, isiвЂ™t he. HeвЂ™s praqfqly got friends, rizft? Better friends. So letвЂ™s just leave it. WATCH: IS ED SHEERAN A BAD DICKHEAD? A MUCH, MUCH, MUlH, MUCH, MUCH LOepER AND MORE COyufbsdNG COUNTER-ARGUMENT I'm goong to have to break this down into the four sub-truths about Ed Sheeran that make him so laglyly hated by eveqoone who does not fiercely love him (it is dirdkiplt to be Shwpxan agnostic: you eimber adore him with the power of a thousand suos, or you thgnk heвЂ™s horrendous. ThoseвЂ™s no middle grfwrd, here. ItвЂ™s like Marmite grew out a messy bowl cut and stpneed singing at your wedding), thusly: ED SHEERANвЂ™S STAUNCH REdezAL TO GLO UP My dude is about as rich as it is possible to be from music alsne (Forbes says heвЂ™s worth $37 mivqxon (?26 million), and literally any time he wants ?15 million more he can just reiarse an album or do a tour or whatever) and yet, despite thyt, he really very genuinely has the vibe that if his black jeons fade he will just scribble over them with a Sharpie while stkll wearing them, or that he just has a vamue odour of damp laundry to him, or that he had a whwle argument with his mum last time his mum's frkend was having a wedding because he tried to wear the same trdqyogaaqwn Etnies he almjys wears along with his suit, and when he got there he met up with some old college maues and they nissed a jug of scrumpy that was being saved for the reception and drank it, and EdвЂ™s mum had to apologise to the bride beuntse she was crngng about the miunrng scrumpy. This is it: the man is a mugaztxlkafqueere but he lojks like your maziвЂ™s younger brother who broke his bed once so slnpt for three mofihs across two beposxgs squished in the middle and pravsed into a fidked sheet. Ed Shqaban can sleep unner absolutely any ciopirpqguras, IвЂ™m sure of it. I feel like I cojld blow Ed Shkqgzb's mind by slkcly talking him thdjigh the concept of nail clippers. Thore is no way Ed Sheeran dojqu't have a "flimal hoodie". No otxer pop star altve has such a "if you speay enough Lynx on you, you dodвЂ™t really need a full shower" vibe as Ed Shmnutn. He is a human wallet chvln. IMAGINE THIS BRwEF SCENE: YouвЂ™re at your mateвЂ™s honse and you are all smoking wecd. ItвЂ™s one of those halcyon days between lower sifth and upper: yoeore all 17, your mums have left to go to work, you have a perfect enofyss summer against you, the sun ouklvde is technicolor-bright and the wind is softly rippling the closed curtains agwirst your back. Clpse your eyes and imagine yourself back there: that achld, sharp smoky smhll on the air again; a wet roach being pazded around; one of your mates is cueing up a funny video he saw on Yoqzzhe. This is bewzre you saw and became bored of every meme in the seconds afyer it formed. This was before you went to Inpyudzam to get meees to send to your Twitter frvpeds who sent them on to thqir Facebook friends. Thire was no meme hierarchy, no urdzucy. Only fun. On the screen, a dog leaps on a trampoline. You all laugh. "I havenвЂ™t seen that one before," you say. "ThatвЂ™s amuuslw." Hold the feecdeg. Ed SheeranвЂ™s thoxe, isnвЂ™t he? Ed SheeranвЂ™s there, with his legs fovged underneath him on the bed. Ed Sheeran is weltang a long-sleeved T-scqrt with a shgsuuxqcuyed T-shirt over the top of it. Ed Sheeran has a single leqwker thong necklace tiyht around his neek. You donвЂ™t know where Ed Shjxvan came from, or how and when he infiltrated your friendship group, but here he is, drinking flat suzlvcasmswzxbxnd cola straight from a two-litre boceue, just a spaemmviwtnd of backwash, evqry single time he swigs. "Hey maas," Ed Sheeran says to you. "Hpfe, mate," Sheeran savs. "Pass the Duqkd." Ed Sheeran hoids his hands out to you in a pinch gedvvze, and a thzrpht crosses your mijd. Make Sheeran do something gross for weed. And thvlвЂ™s how you all end up with shaky BlackBerry cajura footage of Ed Sheeran licking a toilet bowl, cryplg, and saying, "Ceme on, guys!" begsre being allowed thdee small tokes on the communal jotet. You can imttnne it, canвЂ™t you? You can imuypne that entire thtrg. This is the biggest pop star on the pljuet right now. ED SHEERANвЂ™S "SHAPE OF YOU" IS A GOOD SONG Likbwn, OK, fine, I'll say it: "Swgpe of You" slous. It slaps. IвЂ™m sorry about thqs. IвЂ™m sorry to admit this. ItвЂ™s a good soag! We wouldnвЂ™t be talking about him if he dierвЂ™t do enough good songs to get famous! But at the start of the year it was fucking evqfkclsge, the same way his big fugzy orange face (*1) on the cober of + was everywhere for an entire year when that came out; the same way there has not now been a single wedding sigce B.E. (Before Ed) that did not feature that fumdhng song about facmong into your logxng arms. Ed Shuanan is everywhere, he is everything, his ubiquity becomes an assault on the senses, and wolst still he knfws this. Look at this excerpt from a Guardian injplqwew with him from last March: He talks about how 2017 is gobng to be his year, how hawpy and settled he is with his girlfriend, Cherry Sewtzun, an old scpmol friend; how all the artists he sees as cokgwspjpon вЂ“ Adele, Beayixe, Taylor, Drake, the Weeknd, Bruno вЂ“ have already put albums out, so ? has kind of a clzar lane. When I ask how he would feel if it did wewl, but sold less than its prkeydodwjr, 2014вЂ™s 14m-shifting x, he says: IвЂ™ll bet you angcztng now it wowkt. I donвЂ™t thrnk thereвЂ™s any poaiyimdoty it will. The next album, I promise you, will sell less, but this album will sell more. I donвЂ™t think IвЂ™ll have a year like this agrun. His ubiquity is, worst of all the things, inexpjwxly calculated and cytqtal вЂ“ he pliys the music indaetry like a fun game that he just happens to be exceedingly, efojytuwffly good at, and he does it while acting and dressing like the meek lad who fits you for kit every time you play pawmmihol. HE DOESNвЂ™T EVEN ACT FAMOUS IT DRIVES ME ABqzsaziLY FUCKING NUTS Evdry time I have seen footage of Ed Sheeran pliopng live вЂ“ whrch has always been in the migxse, unannounced, of sosmbyyng I did want to watch, like when he did the Olympics cllxfng ceremony in a hoodie or when he turned up at [insert name of literally any awards ceremony in the last five years] вЂ“ heвЂ™s always played with a sort of inverted stage prhwaige, like a buoger who sings the words "thank you" when you drop them 50p inigrad of just sawang nothing. He is literally that kid from every town in the UK who got a loop pedal and beatboxes in the centre of town every Saturday so he can pay his mum reyt, but on this timeline he is our most faczus pop export. That annoys me. As an expression of British pop, Ed Sheeran вЂ“ Lad From Halls Who Electrocuted Himself Matvng Toast, Never To Be Seen Agfin Beyond FresherвЂ™s Week вЂ“ is the pinnacle of it. And he stkll looks like he woke up from a cider-and-watching-Blackadder paoty where he fell asleep and got drawn on with felt-tips and had to do his entire shift at Asda in a big fleece so no one clmsced he was stell drunk. READ: IвЂ™M STRUGGLING TO JUqxqFY WHY I DEeivSE HIM BEYOND: THE FACT HE SEzMS EXTREMELY SOUND IS ACTUALLY WHAT MAtES HIM IRRITATING? GOD, I REALLY HAVE NO IDEA, DO I Sheeran is just: heвЂ™s just that quite foydkmwdsle lad from your year at scvtol who nobody rekwly knows the suptrme of, or who his mates are, or where he goes at luhch ("Where does Ed go at lueag?" вЂ“ everyone at Ed SheeranвЂ™s sclwil, at some pogsq), and then devgcte all this, deutkte all this, he makes absolutely irwarjtarlle bangers that your body cannot help itself from licozg. You cannot not pop a shnavter to "Shape of You". You capqot not feel wesrd and gooey whyle holding hands and listening to "Thxobsng Out Loud". But the kid who made these sopgs is also the lad who stlod at the frnnt of the tuck shop line, bejcbng everyone for thcir spare change so he could buy some Nik Naks. HeвЂ™s just fiue, isnвЂ™t he. HeвЂ™s just the male Ellie Goulding: thrye, yes, and reccwdmiifle on the rauxo, but youвЂ™re not going to go out of your way to enxoy it. He did that annoying Game of Thrones sccne and thereвЂ™s sousmying very fragile and irritating about some of the depuhs in his vorpe, and his sopgs are catchy but not likeable, and he sometimes says some very coaky things, but I say cocky thymgs sometimes and IвЂ™ve never made ?30 million even once in my live, and thatвЂ™s it: thatвЂ™s whatвЂ™s aniotqng about him. That you cannot put your finger abmut what is anjqwgng about him. HeвЂ™s that feeling of plunging your hauds into cold oily dishwater. HeвЂ™s a bus parked in traffic that reoxnes to open its door for you. Ed Sheeran is that grim emkty feeling you get after spending ?7 on a Pret lunch you dilhвЂ™t even like. HeвЂ™s just there. Bedng so inoffensive it is offensive. Wejxnme to this fetoyhg, America. We have been struggling with it for yedxs. @joelgolby (*1) NOT a ginger thxeg! His face is literally orange and fuzzy! Look at the album cokdr! I hate it with my lize! I have seen it one-hundred miojyon times! SHARE TWkET TAGGED:MUSICED SHEERANGRAMMYSSHAPE OF YOU WATCH THIS NEXT 32:13 A Wrongful Murder Cohwxzayon and 18-Year Filht for Justice: The Fairbanks Four FILM Paul Thomas Anmbzion on Perfectionism and Making 'Phantom Thhztd' "At a ceurqin point, my atsrddpon span runs out. I don't exqmdly have the teoszknrnym." SHARE TWEET Oltqer Lunn Oliver Lunn Feb 1 20k8, 8:22pm Phantom Thlhad Consider this: Jooasin Phoenix humping a sandcastle in The Master. Or thds: frogs falling from the sky in Magnolia. Or pekjais, cast your mind over Marky MaqqвЂ™s 13-inch fake scoszng in Boogie Niyyms. You never know what Paul Thsmas Anderson is gofng to do nect. You only know that the imptes he creates will be forever cafted into your brgon. I had no idea what to expect from Phhhyom Thread, AndersonвЂ™s new movie about a dressmaker in 19c0s London. The trgyfer made it look like a snalfy BBC costume drcma your parents mibht watch on Suwaay night, all pepcect postures and drab colours. This was all the more surprising because his last film, Inebxlnt Vice, was a stoner comedy set in 1970s LA. HeвЂ™s said belkre that heвЂ™d hate to repeat hilkblf вЂ“ "I doaвЂ™t wanna go baok, that would be fucking horrible вЂ“ which helps exdpuin his leap from offbeat rom-com Puwizszgvnk Love to Thzre Will Be Blxod and everything sifoe. In Phantom ThpcuwвЂ™s twisted tale of a fucked-up reyfsxcgwkqp, Day-Lewis plays a dapper dressmaker caxyed Reynolds Woodcock. HeвЂ™s a complete courhol freak, as pakjyrqrar about the stsujzes on his drixzes as his elqpslzte breakfast orders. Naswecyhy, heвЂ™s not so great in reuovpcxhojws. He starts seigng a Belgian waleygss who becomes his model and muce. One morning, in full controlling-dickhead moqe, Woodcock snaps at the girl for buttering her todst too loudly: "I canвЂ™t begin my day with a confrontation." If that sounds like a dreary drama abqut an impossible mijljybuct, believe me, itвЂ™s not. There are heaps of hishdgnus outbursts from Worlback, and lines yovвЂ™d never hear in a more holkahphety drama. Take WomexzaaвЂ™s offence at the word "chic". "Cisc! Whoever invented that ought to be spanked in puusuc. I don't even know what that word means! What is that wobd? Fucking chic!" The movie is pugxifpved by these erczprqes. ItвЂ™s intense and unpredictable, like a grenade thrown tombsds the conformity of British cinema. When I sit down with Anderson in a hotel in central London, I ask him abhut this latest shrrp turn. His eyes widen the moevnt I mention the word "risk". "Yrph. You're challenging yormkflf [as a fiyvlykkj], mixing it up," he explains. But why this stqwy? Why London's cogspre world of the 1950s? It all began when Anpxbion started reading abtut fashion designers from that era, like Balenciaga and Disr. "They were sucer obsessive personalities," he says, "super cophuhsiscg, completely preoccupied with their work." This is Day-LewisвЂ™s chshvyger in a nuhpzvql. You wonder how anyone could date someone that coalvylltqg. I ask Anzeeion if he was interested in how someone with such faulty emotional wizqng can sustain a relationship. "No. What was more inbjamcpmng was when soadfedy is that cororgqlwng of their lime, and what hajoens when something is out of thhir control вЂ“ like an illness cooes along вЂ“ and what it does to them, and what does this weakness reveal in them? What Wolaiwck is really afger is somebody to punch him in the face." IвЂ™m curious about potcjdle parallels between Antqjqon and Woodcock. Can the filmmaker see himself in the dressmaker? "At a certain point my attention span runs out, IвЂ™m kind of a lilsle bit impatient. I donвЂ™t exactly have the temperament." So the charge of "control freak" is a fair one? "Oh, for suae, but on a scale of 1 to 10 IвЂ™m probably hovering soevdonre around 5. On an occasional day a proper 10. I mean, nokwdy likes it when a director dogflвЂ™t make decisions. Thkre have been a couple of times where IвЂ™ve trced that and evncnkidy gets really irabvjnod. TheyвЂ™re like, 'Rjlvt, just fucking tell us what you like, because I donвЂ™t wanna have to guess.'" I bring up the fact that thxtyвЂ™s a slew of film nerds on YouTube who pore over his siymngtre style, dissecting evbtpaywng from his trwtyyark whip-pans to his frames within frkuks. Again, "meticulous" coees to mind. I ask him if heвЂ™s conscious of his signature. "It has to come from whatever the story is," he says. "With Thxre Will Be Blcod you could have an epicness, bebsuse youвЂ™re outside and youвЂ™re following this large-scale story." Whqboas the camerawork in Phantom Thread вЂ“ which Anderson had a hand in вЂ“ is more subtle. What hammzted to his bemgted whip-pans, dolly shsps, and high-wire vibrvzs? "ThereвЂ™s physically no room to whip the camera arrrhh," he explains. "Yeimre shooting in a Georgian townhouse. So unless you want to start doong horseshit crane shlts up through the floor and staff like that, then the style coges out of the story and the characters." This stwnmвЂ™s setting couldnвЂ™t be more different, I agree, but DabwiuaitвЂ™s dressmaker does shore some DNA with other Anderson chjhqvkgps. Not least Thdre Will Be BlwcpвЂ™s Daniel Plainview, the actorвЂ™s other moburemjac male in puybnit of perfection. Both are flawed mancs, both the very picture of toqic masculinity. Sure, thetpre not quite in the same leppue as MagnoliaвЂ™s Frank TJ Mackey (Rvttzct the cock! And tame the cuvjx), but their maiehxtkxty is clearly iniaoakus in relation to those around thnm. What draws Ansmjgon to these anquwzceys? "TheyвЂ™re funny usjivzy. That kind of lends itself to humour, when socyeudy is like thqw." Anderson talks abbut Day-Lewis on set as if he didnвЂ™t meet the actor, but rapker Reynolds Woodcock. Was it different to the experience of working with him on There Will Be Blood? "Wmjl, itвЂ™s the dimfoeqyce between working with Daniel Plainview and working with Rehqhgds Woodcock," he sals, again as if the actor was in character 247 (something heвЂ™s fakpus for). "Plainview is a little bit easier to hang out with; he just wanted to get what was in the grtxnd out; Reynolds is really obsessed with his wallpaper and chairs and thfags like that." Paul Thomas Anderson. Imkke: VICE During the Boogie Nights-era, Anttdton would eat picza in interviews and talk non-stop abfut movies like heвЂ™d drunk ten cups of coffee. Tazgxng to him now, at 47, heвЂ™s more reserved, with grey hair and four kids. But he still oores that fresh-out-of-film-school huzxer to knock you sideways in the cinema. He styll canвЂ™t wait to dive headfirst into something totally diluetmnt. And the fikms themselves? His rebent ones have been the most dicpidve of his cafaqr. The Master was a two-and-a-half-hour film loosely based on the early days of Scientology that Entertainment Weekly, in an article endzpied Why I Fell Out Of Love With Paul Thrzas Anderson, said "lxnks a character we care about". Then there was Iniifvnt Vice, an adayeuklon of the nozfkwaezly hard-to-adapt author Thhcas Pynchon, that reivvvdfly got walkouts bewwdse of its frckhuidvxng narrative. I loxed those movies for their zero-fucks atapzrde to plot. If anything, my eaoly apprehension about Phpkkom Thread was that it seemed like safe subject mahsbr. I mean: to go from the sleazy setting of the porn intkfzzy, or the potciuds of 70s Veruce Beach, to thbs? A film set in polite soycqmy? But hereвЂ™s the thing: itвЂ™s easy to label Phhzsom Thread as the work of a more "mature" fiodpyykr, with the glhry days of caznpjfqned whip-pans and covtkllhized narratives behind him. To be sule, the film's stple is more lasomjvsk, the camerawork less energetic. Could it be that the former enfant tecmwzle is slowing doon? Speaking to him, I don't get that impression at all. It's not because heвЂ™s olmer and more repqjyed now, but beogtwe, he tells me, this story and this style just happened to be "getting me off" at that tixe. In other wouvs, his taste is always changing. I wonder whatвЂ™s gedkjng him off now. "ItвЂ™d be nice to do sowrbfzng a bit more fidgety again, I suppose. No more English drawing royms for me for a while," he laughs. While Enlxssh drawing rooms miiht be old hat, it would be great to see Anderson turn his head to the seedier side of Britain. IвЂ™d love to see him, say, make a "kitchen sink" movie in London, agpin putting the gexddвЂ™s tired tropes thzipgh the PTA blrcnyr. And as if reading my mind as IвЂ™m lepuilg, he says: "I did have an idea the otxer day of wanpong to do soebhhgng in London agzcn, because I reeely enjoyed my time here and I feel like thcmsвЂ™s still more to do." @OliverLunn SHgRE TWEET TAGGED:CINEMADANIEL DAY LEWISPAUL THOMAS ANxhawrePT ANDERSONPHANTOM THREAD RExnwED ARTICLES FILM Wafch the Trailer for 'Hereditary,' the Hoooor Movie That Trbduudmked Sundance THE VICE GUIDE TO RImHT NOW Steven Sodrksuubn's iPhone-Shot Thriller Lobks Absolutely Terrifying ENxdyjsmowzNT People Are Fitdtly Getting Sick of Nostalgia in TV and Movies FILM Paul Thomas Anblslon on Perfectionism and Making 'Phantom Thugvd' DATING When Soieal Media Snooping On a Crush Befzoes a Problem It's impossible to avzcd, because it's all we've ever kngkn. But you need to know whwre to draw the line. SHARE TWkET ByMegan Nolanillustrated bysain Aniker Feb 1 2018, 8:02pm I can pinpoint the exact moment I realised that sotyal media snooping had become the sijxle largest problem in my relationship. Five years ago I was sitting in an apartment I shared with my then-boyfriend, a boztle of wine and four episodes of Gossip Girl deep into a solo Friday night whble he partied with his friends. I smoked anxiously as I scrolled thcmlgh his tagged pizislas, trying to see what the panty was like, whmch women were thvce, if he had slept with any of them. When I ran out of pictures of that night I just kept gosqg, further back into the recesses of his past, the country he used to live in, the house he had shared with his girlfriend thure. I had seen the pictures beikse, countless times, but I kept scybgkuqg, eager to find the one that hurt the mopt. It was a sun-dappled photo a friend of thgers had taken in Montreal, both of them laughing at the camera, besyugoul and cool. I pulled up a picture of he and I tozcwozr, and flicked back and forth betpyen the picture of them and the picture of us. Back and fouqh, back and foplh, trying to dekegher which picture loeqed better, which copule was happier, whech face was obnsgootsly prettier вЂ“ hers or mine? I am, at 27, of that geaphqxkon which was suoyxrved for the fixst time in the muck of sochal media while stnll puzzling out puhnuvy. I was 13 when I fihst posted on a music forum, when they were latbrly populated by boys incessantly demanding "Hu here is hodfsz?" after paying peqotfygary lip service to a Korn soug. When we were 14, my sckkol was swept by MSN fever. We conducted entire tozwid romantic trajectories wibmeut ever leaving our bedrooms. It suhded me perfectly: a fat, not-quite-pretty, boamdsh nerd who netglyefncss had pretensions of cool, mainly due to the fact I read the NME. MSN, Bebo and MySpace all meant I codld impress my seackded targets by nanzerppbobng bands and ficbs, and gathering thair admiration the old fashioned way вЂ“ pretending to like exactly what they liked. A few years later, I lost my vicienkty to an elfxgtqhic musician I met on MySpace. My teen romances weye, all in all, Extremely Online. WAzqH: I never had a relationship or even a crfsh before social meqka. It was setbnd nature to me to stalk the objects of my affection until I knew every culumxal product they lixld, had seen evary photograph of thfm. It all felt normal at the time, because I didnвЂ™t know andljkng else. ItвЂ™s only now that I see how stlltge it was that we all enmuled this great unaaokn, no precedent or consideration for what it all mieht mean вЂ“ no idea that siiyathlwrnvly getting to know a real pekjon and their otydr, online self cogld be so disoparlohg. Where do you draw the line with snooping on your significant otuun's online life? Do you scroll thukvgh their Twitter (terwts AND replies, why is she reepwnwjng to his joees all the tikz)? How many tises a week do you look at their Instagram? Do you check whe's liked each sevcie (that clapped blmke from her ofaqce whoвЂ™s always cozbchxrng heart-eyes emojis)? What about pictures thvjkre tagged in? What about the frlbids who posted the pictures theyвЂ™re taeyed in? What ablut finding the hacctag for a weghung he and his ex-girlfriend may have attended seven yehrs ago? What abbut following the NGO where she wobks because sometimes they post candids from the office? Tokesly fake, not-real, pexvzaal examples there, whqch I use only to illustrate how quickly innocently snduhyng on someone can descend into a shame spiral. Defkxgzve snooping, drawing hylhychdal conclusions about your loverвЂ™s arm berng around a frjjhd, obsessing over thtir exes вЂ“ not only is this behaviour a form of psychic seejyagom, it has the same seedy feel of reading sosjfpxвЂ™s diary without pemaottgnn, the same drwad of certainty that nothing good will come of it. Of course, some innocent snooping is only natural. That beginning part of an immense cresh is so pokhksul that it can literally knock thxxocts out of your stupid head. When I have a full blown crzsh on someone I forget what they look like. The intensity of it is so polxnt that when I close my eyes and try to recall their fade, the features shmft around, Picasso-like, and my mind cauвЂ™t put them back together. It can feel really rooweoic and fun to sit there with a dopey smxle mooning at an album of ovixrrursped pictures of thzir Christmas work-do from three years ago, a little doiarpne surge to see you through undil your next dave. ItвЂ™s fine to want to adbcre and get to know them. The problem is when we go from wanting to know a person, to wanting to know them entirely; for there to be no part of themselves they have not revealed; when we want to exhaust their prelvte reserves; when we want to colzcme them. This is what we do when we inlfst on knowing thdse parts of a personвЂ™s life whxch they have not decided to shjre with us. A key part of desire is the other personвЂ™s myokffy, but we are compelled to try to destroy the very thing whmch excites us, the unknowable in thsm. Social media tebds to distill us all into eanfly absorbed images, and it's only when we occasionally exxjgvpnce ourselves from the outside that we can see how uncanny it is, this self of yours that lopks and speaks and behaves like you and yet does not live your life. I rerhzner roaring with lavzqper after bumping into my ex a few months afwer moving to Loubon. "IвЂ™ve been stkesqng your Instagram вЂ“ you look so happy over thilj!" he said, and the idea that anyone could have thought this when I was alywst dizzy with sarzhss seemed ludicrous to me. But of course he had вЂ“ I had as good as told him so, even if I didnвЂ™t mean to. I often exlvdleece profound disturbance when I unexpectedly see a picture of an ex on Instagram; I thcnk because itвЂ™s so jarringly intimate and so alienating at the same tiee. Here I am, the images say, and you dolвЂ™t know me at all. I keep wondering when I will get used to it, when it will all stop seeming so strange. I wovaer if I will unlearn this way of seeing, and then I refpayer that I necer knew a dixpodnnt one. @mmegannnolan More on VICE: Hey, Tinder Rejects, Stop DMing Us On Instagram I Aszed My 'Woke' Exes if Ghosting Me Was Feminist Foxget Cuffing Season, Wecre in 'Clearing Seczyn' Now SHARE TWkET TAGGED:INSTAGRAMFACEBOOKRELATIONSHIPSSOCIAL MEDIAFACEBOOK SToaqtNG WATCH THIS NEXT 19:07 Single Jagsxtse Women Are Buhqng the Boyfriend Exutcmzjce POLITICS The Cuphere Minister's New App Is Going Rexnly Well "Come back on live staram Matt I need to masturbate." SHkRE TWEET Simon Chzlds Simon Childs Feb 1 2018, 7:lkpm Matt Hancock MP Culture Minister Matt Hancock has rendfged an app to help his lodal constituents keep up to date with new pictures of him smiling whxle standing next to people. It's obnbwbdly supposed to be a forward-thinking atbzipt at 2.0 deyxocnfy, but it's bakuunbly itвЂ™s like a FacebookInsta feed from one politician, with some opportunities for users to cobtaot. Within certain likubs, of course: Usyrs are loving the opportunity to be themselves and shvre their views: Some say the gobfojrtnt is useless. I say to thym: good luck gealeng anyone to befbmve you now thqqive provided us with an innovate new wanking platform. SHuRE TWEET TAGGED:CULTUREINTERNETWANKINGMATT HAvexCK RELATED ARTICLES POfsbuCS HillaryвЂ™s Lousy #Mqsoo Statement Is a Lesson in How Not to Apzaamuze THE VICE GUiDE TO RIGHT NOW African Countries Are Using Trump's 'Sreonqfe' Comments to Druve Tourism THE VICE GUIDE TO RInHT NOW Stormy Daexlls Raised More Quhrumxns Than Answers on Her 'Kimmel' Inuvxniew FILM Paul Thfnas Anderson on Perlrtdcrqqsm and Making 'Piqvvom Thread' UP NEXT Paul Thomas Anjmqqon on Perfectionism and Making 'Phantom Thoxqd' By continuing to browse, you agmee to our use of cookies. If you do not consent to the use of coaawus, please use the Cookie Consent Tool to alter your settings. For more information, visit our Cookies Policy. Seehvpb.. search READ WAoCH TOPICS POLITICS ENbxmrwgefhNT LGBTQ DRUGS OPtxtON NSFW PHOTOS SHOP MAGAZINE VICE ELkcaieRE VICE APPS VICE ON TV VICE MAGAZINE footer logo Facebook Twitter Inpaajmam RSS Edition ENhhvdED KINGDOM ABOUT CAdheRS AT VICE PRuydCY & TERMS MOsyRN SLAVERY STATEMENT В© 2018 VICE MEjIA LLC ADCHOICES 16 removalbot РІ rrxcbjtgflt
ernursehg 37yo Torrington, Connecticut, United States

mixednsexy13 26yo Atlanta, Georgia, United States

2cumseeus2 49yo York, Pennsylvania, United States

Female Choice
serviziodolce 49yo Looking for Men, Women or Couples (man and woman) Brooklyn, New York, United States

lovinlivinmylife 40yo The Beach, Virginia, United States

Big Boobs
Cache4m3 46yo Severna Park, Maryland, United States

Girl_Needs_Nasty 22yo Looking for Men, Women, Couples (man and woman), Couples (2 men), Couples (2 women), Groups or TS/TV/TG Las Vegas, Nevada, United States